A Comedian and a Scientist walk into a cage: an explorative study of scientists’ experiences participating in a science comedy radio show

Abstract

Following the Ritual View of Communication, the shared beliefs of scientists appearing in a science comedy radio show are examined. Six interviews are conducted with the goal of synthesizing narratives that scientists use to describe their experience on the “Infinite Monkey Cage”. A quantitative analysis based on a contemporary definition of science communication reveals that conversations predominantly center around the use of Activities and Media to achieve Understanding (of science); Understanding here includes the content, context and social factors of science. A qualitative analysis reveals that Accessibility and Accuracy are the most prominent Values the participants use when describing their experience, followed by Responsibility, Transparency, Relatability and Empathy. Additionally, the roles participants discuss during the conversation are coded. Following the qualitative analysis, the dynamic with which the show operates becomes apparent; this is reinforced by descriptions of the hosts and the format of the show. Based on that dynamic, two narratives emerge. One narrative describes the role of the scientist on the show, while the other deals with the role of the comedian on the show. Participants either align themselves with these narratives or oppose them. Finally, the participants engage in a creative task with the goal of brainstorming a science communication podcast. The ideas cover a varied range of discussions, which reveals the rich array of science communication experiences.