View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Adaptability in Embodied Conversational Agents: Comparing Rule-Based and Generative Models on Learning and Transfer in Conversational Skills

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Thesis - Daniel Benavides Oviedo - 2769689 v2.pdf (1.004Mb)
        Publication date
        2025
        Author
        Benavides Oviedo, Daniel
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Introduction: Embodied conversational agents (ECAs) are simulation-based technologies used for training professional conversational skills. Two design models with contrasting levels of adaptability are generally implemented: rule-based—with constrained and fixed decision paths—and generative—AI-powered customized responses. Their comparative effectiveness for conversational skills training remains unclear. This study explores the effects of both models on learning, transfer, and self-efficacy. Method: Participants (n = 72) were randomly assigned to a rule-based or generative condition. To measure learning progress, participants played their (first) assigned simulation type four times. Then, both groups completed a (second) generative simulation once to assess transfer. Self-efficacy was measured before, during, and after the simulations, while perceived task complexity was measured during and after. Results: Both models facilitated learning progression effectively, however, the generative group demonstrated significantly better transfer—with greater performance gains between the first and second simulations. Rule-based participants rated the second simulation as more complex than the first, while ratings on difficulty for the generative condition did not change between simulations. Self-efficacy remained stable throughout for both groups. Conclusion: Generative models are apparently more effective for training participants to apply skills in real-world conversations while maintaining self-efficacy and stable complexity perceptions across simulations. Future research should examine learning transfer effects in real-world conversations and psychometric validation of the models' grading systems.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/50351
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo