View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Do children need to give less reason to get their will when they have the power anyway? – The moderating roles of culture and age on the relationship of power and reason-giving

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Jule_Peters_1888552_master_thesis.pdf (255.6Kb)
        Publication date
        2024
        Author
        Peters, Jule
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Social conflicts are part of societies and groups. While social animals, might resolve them using power and dominance, Humans evolved an alternative strategy characterised by debating, arguing, and reasoning. It functions as the basis for social skills; however, the question arises whether power impacts decision-making during children's development. This study aims to gain insights into the relationship between reason-giving and power among children, examining the moderating roles of culture and age, two factors that have been shown to impact reasoning behaviour. We hypothesised that children exchange more reasons with equal others. Cultural context is expected to moderate this relationship, with more substantial effects in hierarchical cultures with high-power distance (Kenya) than in egalitarian, low-power distance cultures (the Netherlands). Additionally, we hypothesised that power's influence on reason-giving changes with age, weakening in the Netherlands and strengthening in Kenya. Participants included 131 dyads of children (Mage = 7.49, SD = 1.56) from Kenya and the Netherlands. A mixed experimental, within-subjects design was applied, and children's reasoning was observed during a problem-solving task involving conflicting evidence in either the equality or inequality condition. Experiments were recorded, transcribed, coded and finally analysed using GLMMs. Results support the third hypothesis that reason-giving increases with age. The other three hypotheses were not supported. However, the study contributed to previous research on reason-giving in children. The cross-cultural approach offered first insights into the relationship between power and reason-giving in children and the role of culture and age, offering first indications and suggestions for future research.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/47271
        Collections
        • Theses

        Related items

        Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

        • Power Versus Reason and Its Influence on Children’s Decision Making – Does Power Trump Reason and Is There a Cultural Difference Between Kenyan and Dutch Children When Making Decisions? 

          Brenke, Klara (2024)
        • Validation of the Dutch version of the Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale to evaluate nurses’ perception of clinical reasoning competence 

          Janssen, B. (2021)
          Background: Clinical reasoning is the fundamental base of clinical practice. It guides nurses in gathering, assessing, interpreting information, and generating hypotheses. Clinical reasoning is of significant importance ...
        • Applying Characteristics of Human Reasoning to Zero-shot Reasoning in GPT Models 

          Dona, Loïs (2023)
          This work builds upon an analogy between human and artificial reasoning. Large Transformer based language models have achieved state-of-the-art in many tasks, and recently have even been able to do this without requiring ...
        Utrecht university logo