Combining A Fortiori Reasoning and a Similarity Measure in Case-Based Reasoning
Summary
Over the last years, case-based reasoning has shown to be a promising AI-method in the legal domain,
in which a fortiori reasoning is utilized to find similar cases from the past. However, this approach
limits the decision making process by not being able to make a prediction for every new case, resulting
in a significant number of cases remaining undecided. This thesis discusses the development and
evaluation of a newly created case-based reasoning (C-BR) model designed to address this issue, by
combining two previously designed models: the aforementioned legal C-BR model and a traditional
similarity measure-based C-BR model. Similarity measures are commonly employed in C-BR models
to retrieve previous cases in order to solve new problems. The combined approach proposed in this
case study includes a fortiori reasoning as well, which involves a formal model of legal reasoning
to retrieve similar cases from the past. This combined approach aims to improve the accuracy and
reliability of C-BR models. The combined model was tested on a decision making problem of the
CBR (‘Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen’: Dutch Central Office of Driving Certification), in
which a decision of the fitness to drive of individuals was made based on their health deviations. The
performance of the combined C-BR model was compared to models solely utilizing one of the two
approaches. While results indicate that the combination of both techniques is a promising approach
in C-BR, this model does not outperform the more traditional approach yet, making less humanlike decisions than traditional C-BR with a similarity measure. However, this study emphasizes
the necessity of further research into the applicability of the integrated model in other domains.
Future studies could investigate the potential of the combined C-BR model in datasets that are less
complex. This could increase the performance of case-based reasoning models in AI, making these
models applicable in even more domains to assist human decision making.
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Do children need to give less reason to get their will when they have the power anyway? – The moderating roles of culture and age on the relationship of power and reason-giving
Peters, Jule (2024)Social conflicts are part of societies and groups. While social animals, might resolve them using power and dominance, Humans evolved an alternative strategy characterised by debating, arguing, and reasoning. It functions ... -
Applying Characteristics of Human Reasoning to Zero-shot Reasoning in GPT Models
Dona, Loïs (2023)This work builds upon an analogy between human and artificial reasoning. Large Transformer based language models have achieved state-of-the-art in many tasks, and recently have even been able to do this without requiring ... -
Validation of the Dutch version of the Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale to evaluate nurses’ perception of clinical reasoning competence
Janssen, B. (2021)Background: Clinical reasoning is the fundamental base of clinical practice. It guides nurses in gathering, assessing, interpreting information, and generating hypotheses. Clinical reasoning is of significant importance ...