View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Relational autonomy and self-chosen death in the Netherlands:A critical analysis of the law proposal ‘Wet toetsing levenseindebegeleiding’

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        5974151 MAE Thesis - Annemijn Potappel.pdf (607.6Kb)
        5974151 MAE Thesis - Annemijn Potappel.docx (179.0Kb)
        Publication date
        2023
        Author
        Potappel, Annemijn
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        In Pia Dijkstra’s law proposal regarding elderly people and assisted suicide in case of ‘a finished life’, autonomy is a central concept. Dijkstra argues that the new law proposal will enhance the autonomy of elderly people with a wish to die without unbearable suffering. The way autonomy is approached portrays a focus on rationality, independence, self-consideration and individual choice. In the past decades relational lines of critique have been developed against the traditional approach of autonomy, introducing a relational understanding of autonomy. These approaches try to incorporate emotions, relationships, embedded selves and the asynchronous nature of autonomy. Dijkstra also implements the notion of relational autonomy in her proposal, adopting the term from the 2016 report by the committee of Independent Experts directed by prof. dr; Paul Schnabel. She also builds on insights found in the 2020 Perspective research directed by van Wijngaarden. I build my arguments mostly on accounts of relational autonomy by Gómez, de Maeseneer and Gastmans., Walter and Friedman Ross, Winzelberg, Hanson, Tulksy and Baumann. I introduce three arguments: firstly, the dependence argument in which I argue that A) being dependent is not a threat for autonomy and B) making an autonomous choice cannot be done completely independently. Secondly, I present the ambiguity argument in which I argue that A) the proposal overestimates rationality and reason and B) overlooks the ambiguity of the decision-making process. Thirdly, I present the contextual argument in which I argue that A) the proposal only incorporates relational autonomy in an accidental way and B) incorporates relational autonomy in an instrumental way. In the end I conclude that, while Dijkstra tries to incorporate relational insights on autonomy, she does not sufficiently do so.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/43429
        Collections
        • Theses

        Related items

        Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

        • Autonomie in de bovenbouw. Autonomie door zelfreflectie in de bovenbouw havo en vwo. 

          Opijnen, A. van; Lion, M.J.S.; Rhebergen, M.E. (2013)
          Dit onderzoek richt zich op het vergroten van de perceptie van autonomie van leerlingen in de bovenbouw. Autonomie is naast competentie en relatie een basisbehoefte om gemotiveerd te kunnen leren (Stevens, 2004). Uit ...
        • Soms mag je best een beetje stout zijn. Een onderzoek naar de discrepantie tussen autonomie de jure en autonomie de facto bij het voortgezet onderwijs. 

          Gier, D.P. de (2009)
        • Media-incidenten: een beperking of versterking voor de autonomie van de AFM en DNB? Kwalitatief onderzoek naar het effect van media-incidenten als een vorm van ‘fire alarm’ op de wettelijke en werkelijke autonomie van de AFM en de DNB 

          Ruiter, W.J.M. de (2011)
        Utrecht university logo