View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Psychometrische Kwaliteit van de Testbatterij voor Executieve Aandacht bij Kleuters

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Bachelorthesis Boer, AJCvanden-5621801 en Elbertsen, HC-5620767 en Vries, SGde-5620317 en Wijhe, Ovan-5624606.pdf (464.8Kb)
        Author
        Boer, A.J.C. van den
        Elbertsen, H.C.
        Vries, S.G. de
        Wijhe, O. van
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        This study examines the psychometric quality of the Test Battery for Executive Attention in preschoolers with an age of 3-6 years (TEAK) (Wijnroks, 2015). The test-retest reliability, construct validity and predictive validity of the test battery are discussed. The TEAK, consisting of the tasks sustained attention, selective visual attention, counter-pointing and Go/No-Go, was administered to a sample of 40 typically developing preschoolers. There is a re-test conducted with 20 of these children. The results show that the test-retest reliability of the tasks sustained attention, selective visual attention and Go/No-Go is high. While the test-retest reliability of the counter-pointing task is low. In order to determine the construct validity a confirmatory factor analysis was used. The results show a two-factor model: factor 1 consisting of the tasks sustained attention, selective visual attention and the Go/No-Go task and the second factor consisting of the counter-pointing task. In addition to the administration of the test battery, the teachers of the children have completed the Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 4-17 (SDQ) to determine the predictive validity. The results show that there is a positive significant medium consistency between the sustained attention task and the hyperactivity and inattentive subscale of the SDQ. Such a consistency is also found for the counter-pointing task. The Go/No-Go task and the selective attention task are both not significant with a small consistency. A follow-up study is recommended and adjustments should be made to increase the validity and reliability of the test battery.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/33922
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo