Are the regional water authorities assessming of the impact of small hydraulic systems on water quality in accordance with the european water framework directive
Summary
According to the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Weser arrest, it isn’t allowed to cause
any degradation of the water quality. This rule is challenging for regional water authorities and
raises the following question:
To what extent does, the practice of assessing and addressing the impacts of small hydraulic
structures on the water qualities by the regional water authorities, meet the standards set by EU
law?
To answer this question, the following steps are taken. First an framework is created, which is
used to analyses the assessment practice of the regional water authority Hollandse Delta (WSHD).
In order to find out whether the practice of the WSHD is representative for all regional water
authorities the results of the case study are translated into survey statements and questions. Most
of the regional water authorities reacted on the survey.
In the analytical framework water quality has been defined. Water quality consist out of two
categories: the chemical component and the ecological component. This definition is used by the
EU in the WFD. Monitoring water quality is taking place in designated WFD waters that represent a
larger water system. How to monitor is described in the WFD documents and is translated by the
STOWA in the nine ecological key factors. In a water system several kinds of small hydraulic
structures can be created, all of these small hydraulic structures may have negative effects on the
water quality.
The case study shows the effect that small hydraulic structures have on water quality but how this
can be assessed is barely described in policy documents of WSHD. There is only stated that no
significant degradation is allowed. There is a new policy document of the WSHD coming, which
states that the water quality may not be reduced. Clear strategy for assessing impacts of small
hydraulic structures on the water quality however is missing. This cause some challenges that the
WSHD faces like how to act on the contradiction between the current and the new policy
documents.
The survey reveals that most regional water authorities struggle with the same question of how to
assess the change in water quality caused by the construction of small hydraulic structures.
The conclusion, the assessing and addressing of small hydraulic structures is done to a limited
extant and therefor the standards by the EU are met with a limited extant.
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Water nuisance in Greenport Boskoop: "Searching for a cost-efficient strategy to reduce water nuisance from interacting water level areas in the Gouwepolder"
Huizen, M.E.R. van (2017)During extreme rainfall conditions, the Greenport Boskoop is highly vulnerable to water nuisance. Water nuisance was observed previously inside water level areas in the Gouwepolder, situated in the east of Greenport Boskoop. ... -
Regional Modelling of Water Stress; Irrigation water requirement meets water availability in the Oum Er Rbia basin
Straaten, J.W. van (2017)Current large scale hydrological models have little value for local water resource management, even when applied regionally on downscaled data. They lack the representation of the water-transfers, allocation strategies and ... -
Reassessment of the role of industrial water demand in global monthly water stress, for the year 2000
Gioumpakis, P. (2013)Presently only 10% of maximum available blue water resources, is used by the three consumptive categories, the agricultural, the industrial and the domestic. Recent studies have showed that water demand is expected to ...