View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Interpretable Recurrent Neural Networks for Heart Failure Re-hospitalisation Prediction

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        M.C.Valk_Thesis_3830810.pdf (2.315Mb)
        Publication date
        2018
        Author
        Valk, M.C.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Interpretability and predictive performance are important aspects of a machine learning model. Typically, there is a trade-off between interpretability and predictive performance. This trade-off results in a choice between accurate but opaque models such as multilayer perceptron (MLP) and less accurate but more transparent models such as logistic regression (LR). In the healthcare domain, model interpretability is especially important because the real-life goals (e.g. patient well-being) are hard to model (and thus optimize) formally. Traditional methods such as LR \& MLP use aggregate features and are therefore not able to effectively model temporal dimension that is inherent in Electronic Health Records (EHR) data. Recently, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) approaches have been successful in modelling healthcare data because they are able to effectively take the temporal dimension into account. However, the RNN model is notoriously hard to interpret. We have looked at three recently proposed RNN-based models for medical event prediction that claim to be interpretable (Dipole, GRNN-HA and RETAIN). The interpretability of these models is tied to the implementation of a neural attention mechanism. Having considered how well the models are able to relate the input to the output in understandable terms, we devised an ordering of the interpretability of these models. Then, we compared performance in predicting 30 re-hospitalisation on an EHR dataset with 37,287 medical histories using admission and diagnosis data. The interpretability/performance trade-off within the three `interpretable' models was partly observed. Although the performance of the RNN-based models was quite similar, the difference in interpretability is more substantial. Therefore we believe that the interpretable RNN-based models are the better overall option to use for predicting events in the healthcare domain.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/29301
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo