View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Is er een verschil is in vaardigheidsscores tussen de UGT-R en CITO Rekenen, bij kinderen uit groep 3 en 4 van de basisschool, afhankelijk van de gebruikte rekenmethode?

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Bachelorthesis Benschop, AA-5494192 en Thomassen, EJ-5484278.pdf (372.5Kb)
        Publication date
        2017
        Author
        Benschop, A.A.
        Thomassen, E.J.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        It is important that children have an adequate level of early numeracy, because it can prevent them for later problems with numeracy or mathematics. The level of early numeracy can be measured by different tests, such as the ‘Utrechtse Getalbegrip Toets - Revised’ (UGT-R) and the ‘CITO Rekenen’. In this research the question is examined if there is a connection between the scores on the UGT-R and scores on the CITO Rekenen for 6-8 years old children (n=139), to find out if these tests both measure early numeracy. Also, the question is examined if there is a connection between the used method for mathematics education (Pluspunt and Wereld in Getallen-4) and the scores on both UGT-R and CITO Rekenen. The results show that scores on the UGT-R en CITO Rekenen were significantly connected. No significant differences in scores between the used methods were found, except for scores on two sections of the UGT-R. It can be concluded that UGT-R en CITO Rekenen both measure early numeracy. Also, Pluspunt and Wereld in Getallen-4 show mostly the same results in early numeracy, but they do differ in some parts of early numeracy. Strengths as well as limitations are discussed and lastly there are suggestions for future research.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/27890
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo