Programmable Money, Immutable, Consequences: Regulatory Convergence, Stablecoin Designs, and VC Strategy
Summary
This thesis examines stablecoins as programmable financial instruments with growing
relevance across payments, capital markets, and digital infrastructure. As blockchain-
based assets designed to maintain price stability, stablecoins sit at the intersection of
monetary policy, regulation, and venture investment. The research is conducted within
the context of Maven 11, a venture capital firm specializing in digital assets. It maps
the evolution of stablecoins from simple payment tools to foundational layers in global
finance. The thesis introduces a rating framework to assess stablecoin risk across five
dimensions: regulatory exposure, depegging risk, counterparty risk, backing quality,
and redemption rights. This model provides a basis for reevaluating projects as
regulation and design trends shift. Key regulatory developments such as the EU’s
MiCA and the U.S. GENIUS Act are analyzed to outline how future designs may be
constrained or enabled by compliance requirements. The thesis also contrasts fiat-
backed, algorithmic, and synthetic stablecoins, including a deeper look at novel
models like Ethena’s USDe. Findings show that stablecoins’ disruptive potential lies
not only in technical design but in their ability to sidestep traditional intermediaries and
realign global capital flows. However, widespread adoption remains gated by
infrastructure gaps, regulatory clarity, and accounting treatment. The core
recommendation for investors is to build dynamic, forward-looking evaluation
processes rather than static theses. As the landscape evolves, adaptability and
regulatory awareness are key to identifying category-defining winners in the stablecoin
space.