View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        The Impact of European Renewable Fuel Mandates for Aviation and Shipping on the Dutch Energy System: A Scenario Analysis using IESA-Opt

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        2025.06.26 Final E-Fuels Thesis Sena Korbee.pdf (4.067Mb)
        Publication date
        2025
        Author
        Korbee, Sena
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        The aviation and shipping sectors are challenging to decarbonize. Recent European regulations — ReFuelEU Aviation and FuelEU Maritime — mandate the use of renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs), including hydrogen, e-methanol, e-ammonia, and e-SAF, to enable the uptake of renewable fuels and accelerate emission reductions in shipping and aviation. This research investigates how these policy targets impact the potential for e-fuel production in the Netherlands and their broader implications for the Dutch energy system through 2050. The study identifies key e-fuel production pathways and integrates updated techno-economic data, particularly for electrolyzer investment costs, into the IESA-Opt energy system model. This model was used to simulate cost-optimal fuel mixes, hydrogen and CO₂ demand, and system-wide impacts under a Reference Scenario, a Policy Scenario (with EU mandates), and an Alternative Policy Scenario (generic emission targets without fuel-specific mandates). Results show that under the Policy Scenario, e-fuel production in the Netherlands is technically feasible but significantly increases system costs and renewable energy requirements. Aviation fuel mixes are driven by the policy requirement for 35% e-SAF and 35% biokerosene by 2050, while the maritime sector transitions to LNG, biofuels, and a smaller share of e-methanol. Renewable hydrogen demand rises from 18 PJ in the Reference Scenario to 184 PJ in the Policy Scenario, requiring 6.8 GW of electrolyzer capacity. CO₂ use follows a similar trend: in addition to storage, 7.7 megatons are used for e-fuel synthesis by 2050. What-if analyses reveal that uncertainties in biomass availability and CO₂ storage capacity substantially affect hydrogen and CO₂ demand, DAC deployment, and system costs. The Policy Scenario increases overall system costs by 37% compared to 25% in the Reference Scenario, mainly due to investments in renewable electricity and hydrogen and e-fuel production. The indicative carbon abatement cost is €720 per ton of CO₂. By contrast, the Alternative Policy Scenario achieves the same emissions reductions with more flexibility and at a lower cost of €345 per ton of CO₂. In conclusion, while the EU fuel mandates can drive decarbonization in aviation and shipping, they do so at a high system cost. More cost-effective decarbonization pathways may achieve similar climate benefits without mandating the use of RFNBOs.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/50352
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo