View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Innovators without borders: a critical evaluation of localisation, prioritisation and participation in the Alpine Space’s Smart Specialisation Strategy

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Fiori_thesis.pdf (1.186Mb)
        Publication date
        2025
        Author
        Fiori, Francesco
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        This study evaluates the implementation of Smart Specialisation Strategies (S3) within the Interreg Alpine Space Programme, focusing on the three core principles localisation, prioritisation, and participation across three pilot projects: CaSCo (Carbon Smart Communities), SmartCommUnity, and ASTAHG (Active and Healthy Ageing Governance). Grounded in territorial cohesion theory and evolutionary economic geography, the research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining patent-based quantitative analysis with qualitative document analysis of project reports. Evidence suggested that localization was unevenly applied, with strong alignment in regions like Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes (timber construction) and Vienna (health tech), but with weaker matches in less specialized areas (e.g., Slovenia), highlighting path dependency challenges. Prioritization, assessed via a relatedness-complexity matrix succeeded in projects which targeted high-relatedness/high-complexity sectors. Participation varied significantly among projects: SmartCommUnity’s Regional Stakeholder Groups (RSGs) exemplified quadruple helix engagement, while CaSCo and ASTAHG leaned toward technocratic governance, marginalizing civil society. The study underscores asymmetries in S3’s macro-regional application, advocating for more dynamic capability assessments tools and more meaningful participation practices.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/49294
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo