Degassing in Inland Shipping - An Exploratory Study on Identifying Degassing Patterns and Hotspots on Dutch Inland Waterways Based on AIS and IVS data
Summary
Vessels transporting liquid gasses still contain some vapour after discharging their cargo. These
vessels need to degas their cargo tanks of this vapour in order to not contaminate their next cargo.
Most of the vessels release these vapours unprocessed into the atmosphere. This uncontrolled
degassing of vapours, especially volatile organic compounds (VOCs), from inland tanker vessels can
pose a serious risk for the environment and human health. To combat the uncontrolled degassing of
vessels, the Convention on the collection, Deposit, and reception of waste generated during
Navigation on the Rhine and other Inland waterways (CDNI), which is also ratified by the
Netherlands, introduced a phased ban on the uncontrolled degassing of multiple substances on 1
October 2024. However, the enforcement of this ban proved to be a challenge due to the lack of
effective detection methods. This study explores the potential of using Automatic Identification
System (AIS) and Informatie en volgsysteem Scheepvaart (IVS) data to identify degassing patterns
and hotspots on Dutch inland waterways.
A methodology is developed to detect deviations in tanker vessel movement by comparing the actual
taken routes with the optimal route between the start and destination point. After filtering out
explainable deviating behaviour, a density estimation technique is applied on the data to identify
potential degassing hotspots and an emission volume analysis is conducted to estimate the emission
created by degassing. The results indicate that locations with certain characteristics are preferred for
degassing activities. However, this methodology relies on multiple assumptions, and the current
validation using a confusion matrix indicate a precision of 63.8% (based on 160 predicted
classifications) and a recall of only 42.1% (based on 242 actual cases). The accuracy of the
methodology is indicated on 98.2%, but this is heavily skewed by the large amount of true-negative
results (10.583) .
Despite the many limitations that emerged during the research, the process provides valuable
insights on the strengths and constraints of AIS and IVS data for detecting degassing activity. The
findings can support the Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport (ILT) and Rijkswaterstaat in further
refining detection methods and enforcement strategies and showed the potential of the current
proposed method. Future work should focus on applying the method on bigger datasets, increasing
the accuracy of the method and a better validation of the results.