View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Undetectable, Unrejectable? The Serodivide in the Era of PrEP and U=U

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Meijer_masterthesis23-24.docx (980.9Kb)
        Publication date
        2024
        Author
        Meijer, Sarah
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Background: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and viral suppression through HIV treatment, known as U=U (‘Undetectable=Untransmittable’), are highly effective at preventing sexual HIV transmission between serodifferent partners. As PrEP and U=U may narrow the so-called ‘serodivide’, we assessed openness to serodifferent partnering nationally among gay and bisexual men (GBM) in Australia for the first time in the biomedical prevention era. Methods: A national online survey of Australian GBM was conducted in June–July 2023. Sexually active participants were asked if they would "refuse" sex or a romantic relationship with a partner living with HIV (PLHIV) (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Participants who disagreed were classified as open to serodifferent partnering. Logistic regression identified associated characteristics. Results: Of 2,046 respondents, 1,759 HIV-negative/untested participants with ≥1 sexual partner in the last 6 months were included. Median age was 35.0, 81.2% identified as gay, 70.6% were Australian-born, and 53.3% were current PrEP users. 54.2% perceived U=U as accurate and 52.4% knew ≥1 PLHIV. 75.8% were open to serodifferent sexual partners, and 82.1% of 884 single participants were open to serodifferent romantic partners. Openness to serodifferent sexual partners was associated with perceiving U=U as low (aOR=2.49, 95%CI [1.84, 3.36], p<.001) or zero risk (aOR=6.41, 95%CI [4.39, 9.34], p<.001), current PrEP use (aOR=1.45, 95%CI [1.06, 1.97], p=.019), and knowing ≥1 PLHIV (aOR=2.45, 95%CI [1.87, 3.22], p<.001). Openness to serodifferent romantic partners was associated with perceiving U=U as zero-risk (aOR=3.91, 95%CI [2.18, 7.02], p<.001) and knowing ≥1 PLHIV (aOR=1.67, 95%CI [1.13, 2.46], p=.01). Conclusion: Three-quarters of HIV-negative/untested participants were open to serodifferent partnering (with higher openness to romantic partners). While encouraging, there is room for improvement. Perceiving U=U as zero risk was crucial; promoting understanding of U=U’s message effectiveness is important in bridging the serodivide.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/47798
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo