Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorBacciagaluppi, Guido
dc.contributor.authorHellinga, Menno
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T00:01:01Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T00:01:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/46052
dc.description.abstractAbramsky and Coecke’s categorical quantum mechanics (Cat-QM) is an enticing start to what might one day be a reaxiomatisation of quantum mechanics. Unfortunately, most of its applications have been in the realm of technology, not philosophy. We examine Cat-QM from a philosopher’s point of view, and ask what it can do for quantum foundations. We show that applying the methods of Cat-QM to classical mechanics leads to a categorically formulated quantum-classical distinction, and take some steps in justifying its principles. Since most philosophers of physics are unfamiliar with category theory, we also provide an introduction to 2-category theory, written for this audience.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectApplications of category theory to quantum and classical mechanics; includes an introduction to 2-category theory.
dc.title(No) Categorical Semantics for Classical Protocols
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordscategory theory;quantum mechanics;classical mechanics;classical statistical mechanics;Koopman-Von Neumann mechanics;categorical quantum mechanics;philosophy of science;philosophy of physics;2-categories;monoidal categories;dagger symmetric monoidal categories;strongly compact closed categories;quantum teleportation;quantum foundations
dc.subject.courseuuHistory and Philosophy of Science
dc.thesis.id28366


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record