View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Psychometric properties of the fifth version of the Posttraumatic-Stress-Checklist in a clinical sample of refugees

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        MSc Thesis S.Hofmann 4894618.pdf (578.0Kb)
        Publication date
        2022
        Author
        Hofmann, Samuel
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Background The validity and reliability of the fifth version of the Posttraumatic Stress Checklist (PCL-5) have been demonstrated in numerous studies in Western cultures, various languages, and increasingly in non-Western cultures. However, its applicability in a heterogeneous sample of refugees is controversial because the PCL-5 is based on the Western understanding of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study aimed to measure the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in a sample of refugees and to assess the suitability of this questionnaire for screening refugees living in a Western country for PTSD. Method An existing data set of 1202 refugees was analysed utilising Cronbach’s alpha, inter-item and inter-subscale correlations, convergent and discriminant validity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. For validity assessment, the PCL-5 was compared to the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (CAPS-5), and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Results Clusters generally measured the underlying constructs of PTSD well, however, the expected pattern between subscales was not confirmed, and a ceiling effect was observed. ROC analysis yielded a cut-off score of 44 and inconsistencies were found concerning convergent and discriminant validities. The PCL-5 does not appear to discriminately capture the severity of trauma experienced by refugees. It might be that the previously assumed cut-off score is too low for our treatment-seeking sample as the PCL-5 does not adequately capture the sequential, prolonged, and ongoing traumatisation of refugees. This should be considered when developing and deciding on a screening instrument to be used for refugees. Keywords: PCL-5, PTSD, DSM-5, assessment, refugees, psychometric properties, trauma
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/43169
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo