View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Developing a powdR-based workflow for quantitative powder XRD analysis

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Thesis_complete_NW.pdf (3.059Mb)
        Publication date
        2021
        Author
        Wichern, N.M.A.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Powder XRD is a popular method for mineral quantification, but it often remains semi-quantitative due to difficulties such as preferred orientation in clays and feldspars. Preferred orientation effects are minimised when a full pattern summation quantification method is used. The quantitative powder XRD workflow developed here is centred around such a full pattern summation method: the R application powdR (Butler 2020). PowdR requires a reference library consisting of reference patterns of all to-quantify minerals. A reference library consisting of quartz, calcite, Ca-montmorillonite, labradorite, and microcline was developed here, and used to optimize the workflow. This optimized workflow consists of: 1) homogenising the samples in a McCrone mill; 2) scaling the reference patterns; 3) keeping the difference in intensity magnitude between reference patterns and sample pattern at a minimum; 4) using peak height and averaging multiple peak pairs to obtain the reference intensity ratio (RIR); 5) using manual instead of automatic full pattern summation, and an internal instead of an external standard, whenever possible; 6) using your own laboratory-specific reference library instead of an external one. The success of the peak-height approach is inconsistent with previous research—which has suggested a peak area-based RIR approach—and the cause of this success is unknown. When these recommendations are followed, quantification results with a relative bias of ≤10% can be obtained. When an external library is used instead, relative biases of ≥50% are reported. These large errors result in incorrect interpretations of paleoenvironment, paleoclimate, and diagenetic degree.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/41041
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo