Intrinsic Argument Strength in Structured Argumentation: a Principled Approach

Abstract

Abstract argumentation provides us with methods such as gradual and Dung semantics with which to evaluate arguments after potential attacks by other arguments. Some of these methods can take in- trinsic strengths of arguments as input, with which to modulate the effects of attacks between argu- ments. Coming from abstract argumentation, these methods look only at the relations between argu- ments and not at the structure of the arguments themselves. In structured argumentation the way an argument is constructed, by chaining inference rules starting from premises, is taken into consider- ation. In this thesis we study methods for assign- ing an argument its intrinsic strength, based on the strengths of the premises and inference rules used to form said argument. We first define a set of prin- ciples, which are properties that strength assigning methods might satisfy. We then propose two such methods and analyse which principles they satisfy. Finally, we present a generalised system for creat- ing novel strength assigning methods and speak to the properties of this system regarding the proposed principles.