View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        The Geographer in Schmitt: A comparison between the Spatial Thought of Carl Schmitt and Halford Mackinder

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Thesis_The_Geographer_vanBoxtel_6169260.pdf (4.132Mb)
        Publication date
        2021
        Author
        Boxtel, S.J.C. van
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        This thesis compares the spatial thought of the British geographer Halford Mackinder (1861 – 1947) and the German jurist Carl Schmitt (1888 – 1985), with attention to the way in which they conceived of the ‘spatial revolution’ in the beginning of the twentieth century, and the ways in which these theories legitimated the brute political realities of their time. This thesis points to the fundamental dissimilarities in the spatial ontologies of these authors but emphasizes that both works explicitly justify dubious political practices. Therefore, this thesis concludes that Schmitt’s infamous reference to Mackinder, in the foreword of Schmitt’s work The Nomos of the Earth (1950), is likely rhetorical in nature. Moreover, it suggests that Schmitt’s reference is likely premised upon ignorance of Mackinder’s network and influence – as a so-called ‘aid to statecraft’. Despite the differences in spatial ontology among these two authors, this thesis argues that the comparison between the work of Carl Schmitt and the tradition of ‘classical’ geopolitics is justified, and even beneficial. Uncritical contemporary reappropriation of Schmitt’s (spatial) categories seems undesirable, but that does not mean that Schmitt’s spatial thought ought to be neglected. Critical analyses of Schmitt’s spatial thought illustrate the ways in which complex spatial ontologies justify dubious political practices, beyond the oft-repeated example of Darwinist conceptions of international politics.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/40717
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo