View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Cross Linguistic Influence in Bilingual and Monolingual Second Language Acquisition

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Bremmers, D. (2018) Cross Linguistic Influence in Bilingual and Monolingual Second Language Acquisition.pdf (398.7Kb)
        Publication date
        2018
        Author
        Bremmers, D.J.E.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        The present study combines the two fields of Cross Linguistic Influence (CLI) and simultaneous and early bilingual foreign language learning to examine the spoken data of Dutch monolingual speakers and Dutch/German bilingual speakers of English in terms of Voice Onset Time (VOT) of plosives. Simultaneous and early monolinguals have been shown to have advantages over monolinguals when learning a foreign language due to differences in their linguistic background (Cenoz, 2003; Cenoz, 2011). It has also been argued that CLI is more likely to occur between languages that are typologically close (Jarvis & Odlin, 2000; Odlin, 2013). All three languages in the present study are typologically close. However, Dutch differs from German and English in terms of the voicing contrast. Therefore, it is hypothesised that the bilingual speakers are likely to produce VOTs within the English voicing contrast range thanks to similarities between German and English in the realisation of the voicing contrast resulting in positive CLI. The monolingual speakers are hypothesised to only partially achieve the English voicing contrast (negative CLI), because Dutch has a different realisation of the voicing contrast compared to English. Empirical data support these hypotheses, as the bilinguals’ VOTs were higher than the monolinguals’ in all cases and, thus, closer to the English contrast. However, in certain cases the monolinguals also produced VOTs within the English range.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/39599
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo