View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        A Conflicted Image: Contemporary Western Feminism in Teen Vogue

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        BAThesis_RikkeStevens_19-06-2020.pdf (1.663Mb)
        Publication date
        2020
        Author
        Stevens, R.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        The way narratives about (Western) feminism are constructed changes with time and depends on the party which is doing the storytelling (Hemmings 2011, 13). Within feminist historiography these narratives are often built around the wave metaphor—even if its use remains contested (Evans and Chamberlain 2015, 396). In this thesis I look at how the contemporary image of Western feminism is constructed in the online magazine Teen Vogue. Contrary to traditional historiography which tends to look at past narratives, I will focus on a present one. Via a discourse analysis of ten articles I research how feminism in the magazine is characterised and where its image fits within a wider feminist historiography. By focussing on three different recurring themes (inclusivity and intersectionality, community and solidarity and individuality and self-empowerment) associated with feminism, I argue that the image of contemporary feminism in Teen Vogue is ultimately an ambiguous and at times even acontradictory one. This is a consequence of the fact that the current feminist landscape is both made up of political (third wave) feminisms and what Angela McRobbie calls “faux-feminism[s]” (2009, 1, italics in original) such as popular feminism and postfeminism. Since both of these share certain elements within their discourses (albeit with different intentions), it can cause difficulties and confusion for feminist critics, feminists, as well as other observers to distinguish between them. That is also why I advocate a critical reading of the magazine rather than simply accept its content at face value.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/36769
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo