View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Language use and schizophrenia. An analysis of coherence relations and connectives in schizophrenia spectrum disorder

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Thesis Janna van Egmond 21-01-2019.pdf (1.544Mb)
        Publication date
        2019
        Author
        Egmond, J.C. van
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Schizophrenia spectrum disorder is a disorder that affects several aspects of language and cognition are affected. In the present study we examined the usage of coherence relations expressed by a connective. A coherence relation is a conceptual relation between two phrases or two sentences. Earlier research found that some coherence relations are less complex than others. The question answered in this study is whether there are differences in the usage of coherence relations expressed by a connective between schizophrenia spectrum disorder subjects and healthy controls. We used transcripts of interviews of twenty participants from the PRAAT research for the present study. All connectives expressing a coherence relation were marked and for each connective we determined a coherence relation. After that, all total amounts of the different coherence relations were compared between the two groups. The percentage connectives of all words is 3.63% in the schizophrenia spectrum disorder group and 3,71% in the healthy control group. Relations containing the primitive ‘negative’, ‘positive’, ‘temporal’ and ‘objective’ differ significantly between the two groups. Relations which contain the primitive negative are used more often by healthy controls, in contrast to relations which contain the primitive positive, which are used more frequently by subjects with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Relations which are temporal are used more often by the subjects with schizophrenia spectrum disorder as are relations which contain the primitive objective. The differences in the use of the negative, positive and objective connectives were as expected. The difference in the use of temporal connectives was, however, contrary to our expectations. It is not clear how this could be explained. If we look at the combinations of different primitives, only the combinations of ‘positive-temporal-objective-basic order’ and ‘negative-non causal’ differ significantly. The first combination is used more often by subjects with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and the second combination by healthy controls. Schizophrenia spectrum disorder subjects probably use the first combination more often because they use more temporal connectives in general. For the ‘negative-non causal’ this is presumably because of the fact that the combination negative and non-causal is less complex than the combination negative and causal. Therefore the latter finding is as expected.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/31836
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo