View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Constitutivism as a Method of Justification: A Gewirthian Approach

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Jacobi Thesis.pdf (1.061Mb)
        Publication date
        2018
        Author
        Jacobi, S.L.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        In this thesis, I argue that Gewirth’s constitutivist approach offers a fruitful alternative to the dominant understanding of constitutivism in the current (meta-)ethical discussion about constitutivism as a method of justification. Gewirth’s conception of the relation between the inescapability of agency and the normative authority of its constitutive features has the ability to overcome several fundamental objections to constitutivism. The central features of Gewirthian constitutivism that allow it to overcome these objections are 1) that it need not impose an (escapable) constitutive aim on agency, and 2) that this approach makes a distinction between the constitutive features of action and the evaluative criterion for particular actions. I will argue that this provides the ground for a convincing reply to so-called ‘shmgency-objections’ to constitutivism, as well as to several seemingly paradoxical implications of constitutivism. Furthermore, Gewirth’s approach, if coupled with certain anthropological premises, has the ability to justify a wide range of moral content, making it a viable ground for the justification of substantive moral conclusions. Taken together, these considerations imply that Gewirthian constitutivism deserves more consideration in the current debate, as a fruitful and convincing method of justification for normative- and applied-ethical discourse.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/30963
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo