View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Getalbegrip bij een- en tweetalige kinderen

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Masterthesis Braakman, MMC-5567157.pdf (422.1Kb)
        Publication date
        2017
        Author
        Braakman, M.M.C.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        Working memory and mathematical ability are positively related. The same relation has previously been found between bilingualism and working memory. The aim of this research has been to investigate if bilingual children have a better mathematical ability than their monolingual counterparts and if this relationship can be explained by a difference in working memory. It was hypothesized that bilinguals should have better working memory ability than monolinguals. Due to that they should have better number sense ability too, which could be explained by the difference in working memory ability between bilinguals and monolinguals. The study included 114 participants, aged 6 to 11, of whom 18 where bilingual. Participants were tested individually with different computerised tests to measure number sense (DANS, CNST), verbal working memory (WRB) and visual-spatial working memory ability (OOO). Bilinguals had better mathematical ability than monolinguals, but they did not have better verbal-, visual-spatial or total working memory. The difference in mathematical ability between bilingual and monolingual children can be explained by working memory, even though initially we found no differences in working memory. The two groups of participants were small and differed a lot, conclusions should be interpreted with caution and can be seen as indications upon which further research can be conducted.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/27501
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo