View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Quantitative vs. Qualitative: A Comparison of Methods For Improved Usability Research

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Eeken, N.pdf (2.150Mb)
        Publication date
        2017
        Author
        Eeken, N.A.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        One of the most common ways to perform usability research is by direct observation and questioning. However, there are various psychological and social factors that can influence participants’ behavior when usability research contains explicit self-reporting. It would therefore be very useful to circumvent the subjectivity of traditional usability research by measuring actual behavior, instead of relying on the verbal report of participants. The purpose of this research was, therefore, to determine whether or not quantitative usability research methods provide different, or better insights into the usability of a product than traditional qualitative usability research methods. To explore this, quantitative research was conducted using eye tracking, mouse metrics, EEG, facial expressions and the System Usability Scale (n = 48), as well as qualitative research using observation and questioning (n = 8). Results showed that facial expression analysis and EEG were not particularly suitable for usability purposes and did therefore not provide useful insights. However, eye tracking in combination with mouse metrics identified a larger amount of usability problems (which are also more specific and detailed) compared to traditional qualitative research. On the other hand, qualitative analysis revealed the reasons behind usability problems: something which quantitative analysis could only speculate about. By combining both quantitative and qualitative approaches, the results from qualitative usability research could be an excellent starting point for further in-depth usability research with eye tracking and mouse metrics.
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/26347
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo