Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorGould, L.
dc.contributor.authorTollitt, M.G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-05T17:00:32Z
dc.date.available2016-09-05T17:00:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/24071
dc.description.abstractThis thesis breaks down the commonly used but nonetheless abstract analytical concept of ‘legitimacy’, in the context of the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction and interventions in Libya, following the collapse of the Gaddafi regime in 2011.Three constitutive lenses of legitimacy are proposed: labelled the procedural, the normative and the sociological. The Court's interventions in post-Gaddafi Libya are evaluated on procedural and normative measures, with the current security situation in Libya limiting examination of sociological indicators. Through theoretically-grounded exploration of the Libyan interventions, greater transparency is brought both to the Court’s widely criticised interventions within this situation area, and to an influential concept which it has been all too easy for champions of the ICC to assert, and it critics to reject.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent1399481
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleConflicts of Legitimacy: A 'legitimate' International Criminal Court for post-Gaddafi Libya
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsLegitimacy; international criminal court; international criminal justice; procedural; normative; sociological; Libya; post-Gaddafi
dc.subject.courseuuConflict Studies and Human Rights


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record