TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT UTILIZATION OPTIONS BASED ON COMBINED PHOTOVOLTAIC AND SOLAR THERMAL (PVT) SYSTEMS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
Summary
In this report glazed and unglazed channel tubed PVT collectors are examined and
research is conducted to find the most suitable heat application for different
household sizes. Also a prototype unglazed channel tubed PVT collector developed
within the Nanosol project is experimentally tested and these results have been used
to validate the simulation model. The simulations make use of a 1 dimensional
thermal model based on the equations of Hottel and Whillier. The glazed and
unglazed PVT collectors are optimised for different PV types, tubing materials,
dimensions, flow rate and other parameters. The objective of the optimisation
procedure is to find the lowest payback period and the highest exergy production.
Earlier research has pointed out that the three most promising heat applications for
PVT collectors are preheating DHW, preheating water for a heat pump to provide low
temperature central heating and a combination of both. The total system makes use
of the optimised PVT collectors and this system is optimised for different sizes and
capacities of the system components and different control schemes for the
operation of the circulation pump. The optimisation is based on reducing the simple
payback period. Results show that the lowest simple payback period is for using an
unglazed PVT collector applied for preheating DHW for a large household. The
optimised simple payback period for this PVT system is 8.4 years and mainly the
electric yield is decisive for this result. This optimised system has a collector area of
34.4 m2 and a storage tank volume of 216 L. Another observation is that a small flow
rate is often optimal since this leads to higher PVT outlet temperatures resulting in a
higher operation time of the circulation pump. Aside from the associated gas
savings, a higher operation time also results in more cooling which increases the
electrical yield of the PV cells. Using PVT collectors for preheating water in a heat
pump is less beneficial and the lowest payback period is achieved by a glazed PVT
collector (16.4 years). A combination of both systems led to comparable results to
the PVT heat pump system. Still the additional functionality enabling the system to
preheat water for DHW reduced the simple payback period slightly to 15.8 years.