View Item 
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        •   Utrecht University Student Theses Repository Home
        • UU Theses Repository
        • Theses
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Browse

        All of UU Student Theses RepositoryBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

        Regecide, How the public opinion on regicide changed, comparing Charles I (1649) and Louis XVI (1793).

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        Bachelor Scriptie_Regicide_How the public opinion on regicide changed_comparing Charles I (1649) and Louis XVI (1793)_Sarah Olieman.pdf (785.8Kb)
        Publication date
        2012
        Author
        Olieman, S.L.
        Metadata
        Show full item record
        Summary
        The subject of this essay is regicide, which means killing a king, or the killer of a king, because regis in Latin means: of king and cida means: killer and cidium means: killing. The broad definition of regicide is the deliberate killing of a monarch, or the person responsible for the killing of a monarch. In a narrower sense, in the British tradition, it refers to a judicial execution of a king after a trial. More broadly, it can refer to the killing of an emperor. However, in this essay I will be focussing on the judicial executions of Charles I and Louis XVI. In this essay I wil answer my research question: to what extent did the public opinion on regicide change comparing Charles I’s and Louis XVI’s regicide?
        URI
        https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/10439
        Collections
        • Theses
        Utrecht university logo