| dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Mitima-Verloop, B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Biaga Surya Karuma Windran, . | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-06T18:01:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-06T18:01:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/945 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study determined the reliability, content and construct validity of the Traumatic Grief Inventory – Self-Report (TGI-SR) in a sample of participants who lost their loved one in a car accident (age 18-89 years, n = 301). Between August and September 2017, assessment took place with QIDS, PCL-5 and the TGI-SR at participant’s quarters. Cronbach’s alpha showed that TGI-SR has a good internal consistency (.86). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) produced a four-factor solution. Pearson correlation showed that TGI-SR is positively correlated with the QIDS (r = .31, p < .01) and the PCL-5 (r = .49, p < .01). Post hoc comparisons (Bonferroni’s) showed that the spouse’s relationship type (p < .05) had a higher score compare to mother, father, child, sibling, and other relationship type. Result indicate that the TGI-SR somehow reliable instrument and has a good construct validity. However, it is lacking a big part of local wisdom and culture within. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
| dc.format.extent | 348176 | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | Validation of the Traumatic Grief Inventory – Self-Report (TGI-SR) in Balinese Population who lost their loved one in a car accident. | |
| dc.type.content | Master Thesis | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
| dc.subject.keywords | This study determined the reliability, content and construct validity of the Traumatic Grief Inventory – Self-Report (TGI-SR) in a sample of participants who lost their loved one in a car accident (age 18-89 years, n = 301). Between August and September 2017, assessment took place with QIDS, PCL-5 and the TGI-SR at participant’s quarters. Cronbach’s alpha showed that TGI-SR has a good internal consistency (.86). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) produced a four-factor solution. Pearson correlation showed that TGI-SR is positively correlated with the QIDS (r = .31, p < .01) and the PCL-5 (r = .49, p < .01). Post hoc comparisons (Bonferroni’s) showed that the spouse’s relationship type (p < .05) had a higher score compare to mother, father, child, sibling, and other relationship type. Result indicate that the TGI-SR somehow reliable instrument and has a good construct validity. However, it is lacking a big part of local wisdom and culture within. | |
| dc.subject.courseuu | Clinical Psychology | |
