Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorBoschma, Prof. R. A.
dc.contributor.authorEllwanger, N.D.
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-03T18:00:36Z
dc.date.available2011-11-03
dc.date.available2011-11-03T18:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/9391
dc.description.abstractWithin economic geography and related fields geographical proximity has been identified as a driver of economic processes. Moreover, an increasing body of literature investigates the effects of industrial relatedness, which refers to similarity and complementarity of business activities. In the thesis I ask “Who acquires whom?” and show how and to what extent geographical proximity and industrial relatedness affect M&A partnering. 1,855 Dutch domestic deals that were announced between 2002 and 2008 are examined. One novelty of this study is its regional scale. It appears that geographical proximity not only drives domestic but even local deals, which are deals taking place within the same municipality or province. Another novelty is the estimation of not only the effect of geographical proximity but also the effect of industrial relatedness for every individual deal. The latter is based on a newly developed business activities co-occurrence measure. In addition, a logistic regression model shows that geographical proximity affects M&As independently from industrial relatedness.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent5755936 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleThe Role of Geographical Proximity and Industrial Relatedness in Dutch Domestic M&As
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsM&As, geographical proximity, industrial relatedness, dyadic formation, the Netherlands
dc.subject.courseuuHuman Geography and Planning


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record