Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorD'Alessandro, Roberta
dc.contributor.authorTyrchan, Carolin
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-29T10:01:43Z
dc.date.available2021-10-29T10:01:43Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/78
dc.description.abstractBerlin German (Berlinisch) is known for the 'confusion' of dative and accusative marking, a phenomenon that is known as the Akkudativ. Previous literature concludes that the dialect has a two case system, only distinguishing nominative and oblique/object case, in contrast to High German (Standard German), which distinguishes four cases: nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative. This thesis systematically investigates the distribution of the dative and accusative forms in the dialect, showing that their distribution is in fact systematic and thus delivering counter-evidence to the claim that dative and accusative merge into one unified object case. Original data from questionnaires and elicitations with speakers from Berlin and the surrounding area shows that case marking in Berlin German should be instead analysed as Differential Object Marking (DOM), following a definiteness/specificity, animacy, and possibly gender distinction. In addition, the data shows that the genitive is not ‘lost’ either, as it is still used in possessives and with genitive-licensing prepositions. The animacy distinction can be understood as a level of added complexity, which is reflected in the syntax of DOM objects and dative-form accusatives in PPs. Berlinisch DOM objects are assigned structural accusative, and they do not compete with indirect objects, as some previous accounts of DOM predict. Instead, the mismatch of structural and morphological case can be accounted for by assuming a realisational model of morphology, in which the extra animacy feature gives rise to the spell-out of the dative form rather than the realisation of the underlying structural accusative. The DOM-determining factors can be mapped on a scale, which additionally allows to model synchronic and diachronic variation.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThis thesis investigates the Berlin German 'Akkudativ', a phenomenon in which accusative forms are found in place of datives and dative forms are found in place of accusatives. In contrast to previous literature, it is proposed that the Akkudativ is neither a random confusion of the two cases, nor a sign of their unification into one object case. Based on orignal data, it is shown that the case marking is systematic and should be understood as Differential Object Marking (DOM).
dc.titleRevisiting the Berlin German Akkudativ: Evidence for Differential Object Marking
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsBerlin German; Case; DOM; Microvariation
dc.subject.courseuuLinguistics
dc.thesis.id198


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record