Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorNouwen, R.
dc.contributor.authorKang, H.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T18:00:24Z
dc.date.available2021-09-03T18:00:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/643
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates two theories that provide an account for the distinct difference between relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Kennedy (2009) on one hand proposes that the difference is fundamental to the underlying scale structure of the adjective, while Toledo & Sassoon (2011) on the other hand proposes that the difference is fundamental to the type of comparison class that the adjective is assigned through their typical arguments. This thesis reports on an experiment investigating the nature of the type of comparison class for relative and absolute adjectives, as well as their dependency on their scale structure for interpretation. I find that a combination of the two theories must be made in order to fully comprehend the result of the experiment, and further propose that functionality is one pragmatic factor that influences the interpretation of positive forms of gradable adjectives, among other possible factors.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent553683
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleCan a car really run on empty?: An experiment testing for within- and between-individual comparison classes in relative and absolute adjectives.
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsgradable adjectives, comparison classes, scale structure, experimental semantics, pragmatics, absolute adjectives, relative adjectives
dc.subject.courseuuLinguistics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record