Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorHerder, E.
dc.contributor.authorFragkiadakis, Emmanuel
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-04T23:02:02Z
dc.date.available2025-09-04T23:02:02Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/50349
dc.description.abstractWhile extensive research has examined how interruptions affect task performance, the impact on our time perception remains unexplored. Yet, accurately estimating elapsed time can be critical in domains related to safety, useful in workplaces, and essential for intentional technology use. This thesis investigates whether task interruptions shorten prospective duration judgments through a systematic integration of sequential multitasking and time perception research. We approached this question through three methods: theoretical analysis connecting interruptions to temporal processing via executive resources, a controlled laboratory experiment, and a prototype computational cognitive model. Twenty-six participants completed simple typing tasks that were either interrupted by or performed sequentially with N-back tasks of varying complexity, then provided verbal time estimates of the trial's duration. The computational model, based on ACT-R principles, formalized how cognitive operations supporting task switching compete with operations that sample and encode temporal duration. Results confirmed that interruptions significantly impaired task performance—slower typing, more errors, longer resumption lags—replicating established findings. However, effects on time perception were minimal, with only a marginal trend toward decreased timing accuracy but no systematic underestimation. The computational model successfully produced theoretically predicted patterns of temporal underestimation under interruptions, but these diverged from human behavior. While the weak empirical effects may stem from insufficient cognitive load manipulation or measurement limitations, they also suggest that prospective timing may be more resilient to interruption-based disruption than theory predicts. This work demonstrates the value of theory-driven computational modeling for exploring underexplored cognitive phenomena and informs the design of intelligent systems that support human temporal awareness in multitasking environments. Code and materials available at: github.com/emfrg/multitasking-n-time-perception-study
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThis thesis investigates whether task interruptions shorten prospective time perception. An experiment had participants complete typing tasks interrupted by N-back tasks of varying complexity while estimating elapsed time. A prototype computational cognitive model (ACT-R-based) was developed to predict timing disruption from resource competition. Interruptions impaired task performance but showed minimal effects on time estimates. Applications include intelligent interruption management in HCI.
dc.titleLosing Track of Time: Computational Cognitive Modeling of Prospective Timing Under Sequential Multitasking
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsHuman-computer interaction; Time perception; Computational cognitive modeling; Multitasking; Interruptions; Task switching; Prospective timing; ACT-R; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Attention; Working memory; Executive control; Cognitive load; Intelligent systems; Attention-aware systems; Computational interaction; Artificial Intelligence
dc.subject.courseuuHuman-Computer Interaction
dc.thesis.id53679


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record