Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorBelder, Marijke de
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Jiayi
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-31T00:01:40Z
dc.date.available2024-12-31T00:01:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/48279
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the noun-verb categories of disyllabic compounds in Mandarin under the theoretical frameworks of Distributed Morphology (Halle and Marantz 1993, Harley and Noyer 1999) and Exo-skeletal Model (Borer 2005a, 2005b, 2013, 2014). This study focuses on two main research questions. First, are there default categories or specific headedness rules for Mandarin compounds? Second, are there different degrees of malleability among different types of compounds? To investigate these questions, I conducted an experiment with newly-composed Mandarin compounds in NN, NV, VN, and VV patterns. Test 1 was a classifier matching test, where participants were asked to choose either the nominal classifier or the verbal classifier to match the neologism. This corresponds the first research question by examining only the bare forms on these neologisms. Test 2 was an acceptability test, asking participants to rate the degree of acceptability for neologisms under nominal and verbal functional structures, which corresponds to the second research question concerning malleability. Based on the results, which revealed different preferences and probabilities in Test 1, I proposed a language perception model with probabilities. In this model, syntax generates all possible competing structures and probabilities were assigned before they are sent to Logical Form (LF) for further meaning processing. I also propose that probabilities for Mandarin compounds are assigned based on a new Headedness Model with weighted constraints. The head of a compound is determined by probabilistic reasoning under various morphological constraints. The nominal preference of VN compounds with unaccusative monovalent verbs is also explained by the lack of VoiceP. In Test 2, VN compounds demonstrated greater malleability than VV and NN compounds due to their richer potential in syntactic structure generation. The non-preference for NV compounds is attributed to their non-productivity in Mandarin.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectLinguistics, Morphosyntax
dc.titleVerbs or Nouns? The Headedness and Malleability of Mandarin Disyllabic Compounds
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsMandarin Compounds, Headedness, Malleability
dc.subject.courseuuLinguistics
dc.thesis.id34409


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record