| dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND |  | 
| dc.contributor.advisor | Byskov, Morten |  | 
| dc.contributor.author | Rijswijk, Robin van |  | 
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-10T00:02:00Z |  | 
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-10T00:02:00Z |  | 
| dc.date.issued | 2024 |  | 
| dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/47939 |  | 
| dc.description.abstract | In response to proposed revisions to the Opium Act aimed at prohibiting entire groups of substances, this thesis addresses an issue with the classification of hard drugs in the Opiumwet; substances are evaluated and classified as hard drugs, but not reevaluated and reclassified as soft drugs. It is shown that there is an important reason for reclassification of LSD; the possibility of responsible recreational LSD. This thesis shows that when acting with due care, a specification of non-maleficence, responsible recreational LSD use is possible. It does so by building on recent scientific insights on LSD. Moreso, it shows what the case-specific conditions of due care are. It is then concluded that having conditions for responsible recreational LSD use should be reason for the re-evaluation of LSD as a hard drug. |  | 
| dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University |  | 
| dc.language.iso | EN |  | 
| dc.subject | Finding conditions for responsible recreational LSD consumption in the (philosophical) context of due care |  | 
| dc.title | Recreational LSD Consumption with Due Care:
Conditions for Responsible Use |  | 
| dc.type.content | Master Thesis |  | 
| dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access |  | 
| dc.subject.keywords | LSD; due care; principlism; four principles; non-maleficence |  | 
| dc.subject.courseuu | Applied Ethics |  | 
| dc.thesis.id | 32658 |  |