Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorSchaab, Janis
dc.contributor.authorValdés Valenzuela, Raimundo
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T00:03:17Z
dc.date.available2024-10-01T00:03:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/47885
dc.description.abstractThe release of greenhouse gases (GHGs) into the atmosphere due to human activities that, for example, involve the burning of fossil fuels or biomass, has led to the increase of the planet’s temperatures since the Industrial Revolution. GHGs’ long to very long atmospheric lifetimes, which can extend from decades to centuries or even millennia, imply that present emissions are equal to higher global temperatures in the distant future. Consequences of a heated planet such as the increased frequency of extreme weather events and sea-level rise have potentially devastating effects on human life. Despite international agreements aiming at holding global temperature increases to keep the planet safe for future inhabitants, global GHG emissions just continue to rise. This situation allows for the question of whether the focus of concern of intertemporal justice should shift from inequality of distribution toward inequality of relations which takes place when future lives are at the mercy of present-day powerful actors’ wills. The need for such a shift is defended in the present study through the proposal of non-domination as the ideal of intertemporal justice for the case of climate change. The proposal of non-domination is sustained in the analysis of the relation held between actors with power to drive alterations of the planet and future Earth inhabitants, and the finding of features suggesting that the former dominate the latter. On that basis, a proposal is offered for a basic institutional design to be implemented if intertemporal justice is understood as the promotion of non-domination.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectGiven the persistent increase in global GHG emissions, the thesis explores the question of a potential shift in the ideal of intertemporal justice in the case of climate change. The proposed ideal is that of non-domination which finds its primary base in the suggestion that future earthlings' lives are underestimated because of their morally irrelevant temporal location. After the case of intertemporal domination is presented, an institutional design is proposed for its reduction.
dc.titleClimate Change and Non-domination: A proposal for Future Earth Inhabitants’ rights to Representation and Planet Management
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.courseuuApplied Ethics
dc.thesis.id39343


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record