Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorMontone, Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorTzakis, Ioannis
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-01T23:02:17Z
dc.date.available2024-09-01T23:02:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/47612
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, it has been apparent that more and more investors consider nonmonetary values when constructing their portfolios. Many firms set large wage differentials between workers and managers, with the former sometimes suffering from what is known as behindness aversion. Subsequently, pro-social investors might shun these companies, since they might exhibit income inequality. However, quite low wage differentials might be unfair for the managers and they can also be viewed as low salary growth expectations by employees, insinuating that there might be an optimal wage gap. In four dependent variables employed in this survey I find that the relationship between the pay ratio and institutional ownership is a concave across US listed firms, with the optimal pay ratio being situated at the 35th percentile of the pay ratio distribution.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThis paper examines the way the pay ratio is perceived in the market place. That is, it tests if the relationship between the pay ratio and four dependent variables is linear or concave.
dc.titleThe perception of the pay ratio
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordspay ratio/concavity/institutional ownership/optimal/year fixed effects
dc.subject.courseuuFinancial Management
dc.thesis.id37955


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record