Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorKessler, F.E.
dc.contributor.authorPasmore O'Pray, Eloise
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-06T00:01:53Z
dc.date.available2024-07-06T00:01:53Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/46634
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates a phenomenon that I discovered in the British Film Institute archive: only a few years after commercial Television was launched in Britain in 1955, viewers stopped providing their full attention to commercials. In this thesis, I map out how the problem of inattention developed in the period of 1959 to 1962 based on extensive research in journals of the advertisement industry. I then conduct a comparative analysis of twelve commercials that were made in the mid-1950s to the early-1960s, as this was the period before and during which the problem of inattention was discussed. The commercials that I analyse were made for the brands Mackeson stout and Heineken beer. They were produced by the Dutch Production company Joop Geesink Dollywood Studio. This is a tiny sample of thousands of ads from this artistic collection, of hand-crafted puppet and animated commercials, that are preserved at the Eye Film Museum Netherlands, and of which I have viewed about two hundred. The reason why I analyse these commercials is to observe the impact of inattention, by assessing whether it affected advertisers’ production strategy. In order to understand what exactly Geesink’s production strategy was like before the problem of inattention, I apply Roger Odin’s theory of Semio-Pragmatics. I do this because Odin created ‘levels’ and ‘modes’ that are useful for applying to media, in order to understand how the media communicates and is experienced. I apply this theory to help me understand how Geesink approached advertising, which I argue was by using characteristics of entertainment, like fictionalisation. I then conceive four sales techniques, to compare whether Geesink’s use of them changed from before inattention was discussed and during. Overall, I shed light on the huge yet under-researched Geesink collection, whilst contributing to our understanding of the history of early television advertisement in Britain.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThe subject of this thesis is commercial television in Britain from 1955 to 1962. I map out how viewers' inattention to ads developed during this period. Then I apply Roger Odin’s theory of Semio-Pragmatics to a comparative analysis of twelve animated commercials that were made by the Dutch Joop Geesink Dollywood Studio. I do this to assess the impact of inattention, as this helps me to observe whether it influenced advertisers like Geesink to change their production strategy.
dc.titleRMA Thesis - Eloise Pasmore O'Pray - 6271332
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsAttention;Inattenion;Commercials;Television;Adverts;Britain;1955;1962;Joop Geesink;Alcohol;Animation;Puppets;Dollywood;Advertisers;Semio-Pragmatics;Roger Odin;Communication;Selling;Entertainment;Fictionalisation
dc.subject.courseuuMedia, Art and Performance studies
dc.thesis.id32753


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record