| dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Prakken, Henry | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sman, Stefan van der | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-22T00:01:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-22T00:01:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/46191 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines what role the combination of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and argumentation can play in the explanation of chessendgames. Using the ASPIC+ framework, this thesis tries to enable reasoning about chess endgame positions, specifically king and pawn versus king (KPvK) endgames. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | |
| dc.subject | This thesis examines what role the combination of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and argumentation can play in the explanation of chessendgames. Using the ASPIC+ framework, this thesis tries to enable reasoning about chess endgame positions, specifically king and pawn versus king (KPvK) endgames. | |
| dc.title | Using computational argumentation for explainable chess AI | |
| dc.type.content | Master Thesis | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
| dc.subject.courseuu | Artificial Intelligence | |
| dc.thesis.id | 29352 | |
