Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorSegers, Dr. M.L.L.
dc.contributor.authorBerg, K. van den
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-22T17:00:36Z
dc.date.available2010-04-22
dc.date.available2010-04-22T17:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/4526
dc.description.abstractContrasting the accession of Spain and the potential accession of Turkey in two policy areas: the Common Agricultural Policy and the Free Movement of Workers. How did and do these chapters influence the course of the negotiations? Furthermore, the negotiations technique of the EU is discussed - the 'bilateral format' is a success for the interests of the EU. The acceding countries however have no other option than to accept the EU proposals in order to become a member state. Should the bilateral format be replcaed with another negotiations format?
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent477696 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleDialogue is the key, misperception the danger: Spain and Turkey on their respective paths towards EEC/EU accession
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsTurkey, Spain, EEC, EU, accession negotiations
dc.subject.courseuuInternationale betrekkingen in historisch perspectief


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record