Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorEsch, Femke van
dc.contributor.authorDiepen, Jonas van
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T00:00:42Z
dc.date.available2023-08-29T00:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/44795
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the extent to which EU and US democracy promotion has affected recipients their response to the three Russian invasions of neighbouring countries from 2008 until 2022. To do so it applies mixed methods, including a regression analysis using voting results on UNGA resolutions condemning the Russian invasions as an independent variable, and an in-depth case study of Ethiopia's response to the invasions using document analysis. The results show that the proven effect of democracy promotion on democracy levels does not directly translate into international alignment against Russia, as one would expect based on democratic peace theory. Rather, the analysis suggests that an increase in export levels to the EU and the US are significant predictors of voting in favour of the relevant UNGA resolutions, underlining the importance of trade relations in geopolitics, and confirming the premise of capitalist peace theory. Implicitly, the results question the strategic relevance of democracy promotion within the context of international relations and the competition between democratic and authoritarian states.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThis thesis researches the extent to which EU and US democracy promotion affected recipients their response to Russian invasions of neighbouring countries from 2008 until 2022, using a mixed-methods approach.
dc.titleShifting the Balance: The Role of Democracy Promotion in the International Response to Contemporary Russian Expansionism
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsDemocracy promotion; Russo-Ukrainian war; European Union; EU; United States; US; International Relations; democracy; authoritarianism; hybrid regimes; United Nations General Assembly; UNGA; Mixed-Methods; Non-Alignment; strategic non-alignment; non-alignment; Ethiopia; NATO; Georgia, Ukraine; Russia; Abkhazia; South-Ossetia; Crimea; democratic peace theory; capitalist peace theory; commercial peace theory; DPT; CPT: geopolitics
dc.subject.courseuuEuropean Governance
dc.thesis.id22768


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record