Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorEijkemans, René
dc.contributor.authorHoltari, Riikka
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-10T00:05:00Z
dc.date.available2023-08-10T00:05:00Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/44601
dc.description.abstractIn order to evaluate the impact of outcome misclassification on the possible causal association between Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and COVID-19 vaccination, we conducted a literature review and a simulation study. The literature study aimed to obtain a plausible range of outcome misclassification indices of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding systems used in electronic healthcare databases. We used logistic regression to contrast a naïve estimator that disregards misclassification with a misclassification-integrating Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) model to explore the relationship between vaccine exposure and the occurrence of AESIs. The MLE model employed marginal probability from a Bernoulli distribution to account for misclassification, facilitating a comparison of log of odds ratios and relative risks between the models. In our simulation study, we generated data which incorporated a fixed vaccination rate, varying sample sizes, regression coefficients, and misclassification rates to evaluate bias and mean squared error (MSE) of the log of odds ratio and the relative risk. The analyses showed that the MLE model exhibited reduced bias under high prevalence and specificity conditions when examining the relative risk bias. Despite its great variability, the MLE model outperformed the naïve estimator in specific simulations with increased association strengths, supporting our hypothesis. Our findings reveal a need for rigorous methodologies to address misclassification in vaccine safety assessments and indicate that the degree of misclassification may be significant, depending on the specific ICD code. Our research highlighted the importance of thoroughly recognising misclassified data and outlined critical areas for future research in epidemiology. Our observations demonstrated that the traditional approach, which disregards the subsequent bias brought on by misclassification – is not fundamentally flawed, emphasising the need to investigate how and when these errors can be significant.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThis paper conducted a literature review and a simulation study to evaluate the impact of outcome misclassification on the association between Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and COVID-19 vaccination. Utilising logistic regression, we contrasted a standard model with a misclassification-integrating Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) model, discovering that the MLE model reduced bias in specific scenarios.
dc.titleCOVID-19 Vaccines and the Misclassification of Adverse Events
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.courseuuEpidemiology
dc.thesis.id21325


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record