| dc.description.abstract | Requirements evolution is a phenomenon that has been acknowledged and recognized, but
not extensively researched yet. It has been widely known that requirements change is one of
the most persistent challenges in the software industry. Having such a closely related field be
seen as a persistent challenge, and the fact that researchers have been calling out for more
research on the topic, emphasizes the necessity for research on requirements evolution. In
this study, we delve deeper into requirements evolution through an exploratory case study,
supported by a literature study.
In the literature study, we encountered various definitions and taxonomies on the topic,
from which we developed a taxonomy of requirements evolution. In the case study, we
closely followed the progress of an internal software project from its initiation until the
creation of a minimum viable product. We collected all requirements and requirementsrelevant information, tagged it, and create sequences of changes that represent the evolution
of a requirement. Our analysis focused on identifying evolution patterns, combinations of
associated tags, and the influence of timing, source location, and initiators on requirements
evolution. Lastly, we investigated the similarities and differences of requirements evolution
between the contents of conversations and those of project management systems.
We discovered some evidence that irreversible changes are less likely to occur, and we
observed a correlation between stakeholders’ roles and the requirements evolution steps they
initiate. Furthermore, this correlation appeared to be linked to the company’s working
methodology, as revealed through stakeholder interviews conducted during the case study.
Finally, we analyzed the recorded requirements conversations, and their connection to the
documented requirements evolution from the project management system. We found that
these conversations need to be analyzed on a different granularity level to be effectively
utilized, and that there were differences in the occurrence of different tags between these
discussions and the requirement management system. | |
