| dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Harinck, Christiaan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gasparini, Amedeo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-06T00:00:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-06T00:00:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/44111 | |
| dc.description.abstract | ["",""] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | |
| dc.subject | In International Relations terms, appeasement might be considered a classical liberalism’s policy for its strong concerns with trade, peace, and cooperation. However, while focusing on Great Britain, this Thesis argues that appeasement per se is not close to liberalism in International Relations (IR) – more to realism. Is appeasement a classical liberalism’s policy? | |
| dc.title | Contesting Appeasement as a Classical Liberalism’s Policy. The Case of 1938-9 Czechoslovakia: From the Sudetenland Crisis to the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia | |
| dc.type.content | Master Thesis | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
| dc.subject.courseuu | International Relations in Historical Perspective | |
| dc.thesis.id | 18167 | |
