Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorCasteren, J.M.R. van
dc.contributor.authorStadtbäumer, Till
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T00:00:51Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T00:00:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/43798
dc.description.abstractThe thesis evaluates the jurisprudence of the ECJ on religious freedom (inter alia Egenberger, Achbita & Bougnaoui) from the perspective of the constitutional order of the EU and the relationship between the ECJ and national constitutional courts. The assessment of the ECJ's jurisprudence is firstly based on the supremacy locks, thus ultra vires, fundamental rights and the national constitutional identity and secondly on three selected supremacy theories (Constitutional Pluralism, Multilevel Constitutionalism and Composite Constitutionalism).
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThe thesis evaluates the jurisprudence of the ECJ on religious freedom (inter alia Egenberger, Achbita & Bougnaoui) from the perspective of the constitutional order of the EU and the relationship between the ECJ and national constitutional courts.
dc.titleReligious Freedom in the EU: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice in Light of Diverging National Case Law
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsEuropean Court of Justice; Religious Freedom; Freedom of Religion; Achbita; Bougnaoui; Egenberger; religious symbols in the workplace; occupational requirements; fundamental rights
dc.subject.courseuuEuropean Law
dc.thesis.id15834


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record