| dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Boom, Jan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Boessenkool, Carien | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-17T01:00:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-17T01:00:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/43435 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | |
| dc.subject | The Defining Issues Test (DIT-2) and the Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective (SRM-SFO) aim to assess moral reasoning maturity. Both instruments are derived from the Neo-Kohlbergian theories of, respectively, James Rest and John Gibbs. This study, for the first time, compared both theories and their measures, using a sample of Dutch adolescents between 16- and 21-year-old (N = 79). | |
| dc.title | Assessing moral judgment maturity using the Defining Issues Test (DIT-2) and the Sociomoral Reflection Measure- Short Form Objective (SRM-SFO). | |
| dc.type.content | Master Thesis | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
| dc.subject.courseuu | Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology | |
| dc.thesis.id | 13109 | |
