Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorSwinkels, E.M.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Lorenzo, Lorena
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T03:02:25Z
dc.date.available2022-09-09T03:02:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/42653
dc.description.abstractWhy do policy-makers often decide it is good timing to change policies deeply right after the start of specific crises or external shocks? This research on discourse analysis focuses on the 2022 Ukrainian war to explore what are the causal logics and mechanisms that are responsible for policy change during critical junctures, and which led to the revolutionary joint belief shift of becoming energy independent from Russia. With the help of Discourse Network Analysis and semi-structured interviews with EU officials, this paper offers a relevant selection of primary and secondary data sources to comprehensively elucidate how involved actors’ discourses and sets of beliefs on EU energy policy have changed over time around the subject. This empirical approximation, therefore, allows to thoroughly map actor’s congruence and affiliation networks, with the logic of identifying dominant discourses throughout three phases –from September 2021 to July 2022. Findings in this research rightfully show that, for the 2022 Ukrainian war, players involved in EU energy policy were capable, in the end, of modifying their beliefs and embracing new and innovative ideas in favour of energy independence from Russia. For this to happen, important political (and symbolic) events and initiatives were needed in order to activate a novel joint belief shift at the heart of the EU. Likewise, these actors successfully convinced more and more players in favour of this, making them to defect from their previous ideas and discourses. This research, therefore, expands specific knowledge on the causal study of critical junctures, confirming that institutional change is caused if different conditions apart from the external shock itself –critical antecedents, productive conditions, or joint belief shift, among others– are met. In addition, it complements comprehensive studies on EU integration, and supports the general belief that the EU is, as politician J. Monnet once proclaimed in 1976, ‘forged in crisis’.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThis research on discourse analysis centers on how powerful actors' ideas and discourses can be when suitable conditions during an external shock –better known as critical juncture– are met. The main idea behind this project is then to causally investigate how institutional change in a given polity actually occurs. Therefore, the current 2022 Ukrainian war is taken as the main research subject in order to analyze the direct effects of this critical juncture in EU energy policy and discourses.
dc.titleNever waste a good crisis? A thesis research on changes in EU energy policy discourses in the 2022 Ukrainian war context
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsEU, Russia, Ukrainian war, gas, energy policy, RePowerEU, critical juncture, institutional change, beliefs, Discourse Network Analysis, semi-structured interviews, discursive institutionalism
dc.subject.courseuuEuropean Governance
dc.thesis.id10093


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record