Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorKeijzer, Linda
dc.contributor.authorGoetstouwers, Damiaan
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T02:01:33Z
dc.date.available2022-09-09T02:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/42524
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses how to best return of the assets corrupt government officials. It complements current literature and frameworks, which mainly look at the return of the assets of professional criminals. Through the analysis of eight case studies, it concludes that confiscating authorities should employ an ‘indirect’ method of return through bilateral agreements or trust funds. To ensure the most successful outcome of the process of asset return, the paper concludes with seven key recommendations to the European Union. The appendix provides an overview of definition and the most used abbreviations.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectThis paper analyses how to best return of the assets corrupt government officials.
dc.titleGoetstouwers, D. - Asset Recovery in the Face of Kleptocracy
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsasset recovery; confiscation; corruption; asset return
dc.subject.courseuuEuropean Governance
dc.thesis.id9508


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record