Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorWickham, M.I.
dc.contributor.authorLemmen, I.C. van
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T18:00:19Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T18:00:19Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/40475
dc.description.abstractGender-inclusive language has become increasingly visible in recent times − due to growing gender diversity − yet it is met with widespread criticism. To build on the existing categorization of criticism against gender-inclusive language, the purpose of this study was to identify underlying psychological mechanisms of this criticism. As such, online surveys were distributed to a sample of Dutch participants (N = 117). The resulting data was analyzed with a multiple regression analysis, MANOVA and a mediation analysis. Biological essentialism and precariousness of gender identity were identified as important predictors of negative attitudes towards gender-inclusive initiatives. Inclusion of a framing variable during the surveys resulted in null findings; implications for nudging and recommendations for future research on threat and gender essentialism are discussed.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent551486
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleOn Gender-Inclusive Language and Its Opponents’ Motivations
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsgender-inclusive language, gender essentialism, fear of gender identity loss, precariousness of gender identity, system justification, gender identification, freedom of speech
dc.subject.courseuuLiberal Arts and Sciences


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record