Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorTuin, I. van der
dc.contributor.authorHeerink, J.G.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T17:00:19Z
dc.date.available2018-10-17T17:00:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/39032
dc.description.abstractScientism is very popular today, which is problematic, as Kuhn’s theory of paradigms and Nietzsche’s perspectivism show that science gives a limited perspective on the world. To counter scientism and de-centre science, I will be mapping the different ways of understanding the world which are dominant in scientific, indigenous, East Asian and feminist traditions. I will be diffractively reading how people from the latter three groups have criticized science, mapping how the differences between the ways of understanding the world they plead for and those they plead against matter. I am contributing to a new big picture in which different ways of understanding the world are situated and can be responsibly used, because we are aware of their benefits and disadvantages.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent1125861
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleDe-Centring Science: Diffractively Mapping Ways of Understanding the World
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsscientism; science; paradigm; perspectivism; diffraction; indigenous; feminist; East-Asian; difference
dc.subject.courseuuHistory and Philosophy of Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record